The Controversy Surrounding the Russian Series Plevako
The Russian series Plevako ignited a firestorm of reactions from viewers, splitting opinions right down the middle. On one hand, critics decry the production quality, the acting prowess, and historical accuracy. On the other, there is an outpouring of admiration for the artistic choices and the talent of the crew involved. Let ’s delve into the key points that fuel this heated debate.
Serguei Bezrukov in the Lead Role: A Familiar Face or Just Boring?
One of the major talking points has been Serguei Bezrukov’s portrayal of the titular character. A significant portion of viewers remarked that his very presence sets a certain tone for the series. Phrases circulating within the community like "Bezrukov in the credits — time to turn off the screen" have become emblematic of the audience's fatigue over his frequent appearances in mainstream Russian productions.
However, not everyone shares this sentiment. A user from Cherepovets, Vyacheslav, offered a glowing review: "Good film. Bezrukov is magnificent!" This reframing showcases the divisive nature of public opinion about established actors in popular roles.
Historical Accuracy: Is Realism Truly That Important?
The series has faced its fair share of scrutiny, particularly focused on its commitment to historical facts. For instance, a scene depicting the protagonist engaging in a pagan ritual by setting his mother aflame shocked even the most loyal viewers. Vyacheslav's comment underscores the prevailing mood: "The series is utterly unengaging. Bezrukov mumbles his lines like he’s chewing on porridge."
Yet, despite this criticism, some audiences argue that artistic liberty has its place. "If you’re after absolute accuracy — Wikipedia is crying out for you!" quips Nikolai, suggesting that one should view the show in the light of entertainment rather than as a historical documentary.
Comparisons with Western Productions
The tendency to compare Plevako with its Western counterparts is prevalent. Some viewers pinpoint that the series seems eager to mimic the style of Guy Ritchie's films. One viewer sarcastically remarked, "I’m pleased to note that our creators have finally seen Ritchie’s Sherlock Holmes!" Conversely, another commenter argued that such emulation isn't always valid: "Gangs of New York is a good movie, but it’s hard to call it historically accurate. Why not forge our own path?"
Costumes, Direction, and Screenplay: The Project's Strong Points
Amidst the criticism, it’s essential to acknowledge the series’ commendable aspects. Tatyana expressed her appreciation by stating: "I’m applauding the director, writers, actors, and costume designers standing up!" According to her, the project harmoniously intertwines drama, action, and elements of historical narrative.
The Character of Plevako: Charisma or Manipulation?
The very figure of attorney Fyodor Plevako stirs up a flurry of discussion. Yevgeny labeled him a "hyped-up empty vessel and manipulator," critiquing his reliance on emotional appeals to jurors rather than on factual arguments. On the flip side, seasoned lawyers like Eduard K. disagree, stating, "He acted given the circumstances. If such manipulations were effective then, why not employ them?"
Culmination: To Watch or Not to Watch?
A Question to Our Viewers
What are your thoughts on blending artistic fiction with historical events in television series? We invite you to share your insights!